Anbefaling av en sunnhetsmerkeordning/Vedlegg 11

1. The European Consumers’ Organisation (BEUC): Discussion Group on Simplified Labelling: Final Report. Simpler labelling for healthier choices-BEUC/X/044/2006.
2. The European Food Information council (EUFIC) research on labelling http://www.eufic.org/article/en/nutrition/food-labelling-claims/expid/forum-consumer-attitudes-information-food-labelling/
   Phase 1: Getting insights on consumer understanding of nutrition information on food labels motivational aspects. EUFIC Forum 2.
   Phase 2: Identifying the potential of a number of on-pack nutrition communication concepts to engage consumers and help them understand nutrition information on food labels. EUFIC Forum 3.
   Phase 3: Systematic review of consumer understanding of nutrition information of food labels in Europe since 2003.
3. Grunert KG, Mills JM. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. Journal of Public Health 2007.
4. Det svenske nøkkelhullet: www.nyckelhalet.se
5. Larson I, Lissner L. «The Green Keyhole» nutritional campaign in Sweden: do women with more knowledge have better dietary practices? European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996; 50:323-328.
6. Larson I, Lissner L. «The Green Keyhole» revisited: nutritional knowledge may influence food selection. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999. 53:776-780.
7. Referanser til forbrukerundersøkelser i Sverige om nøkkelhullets:
   • Konsumentundersökning Livsmedelsverket, Statistiska centralbyrån, 2003. http://www.slv.se/templates/SLV_Page.aspx?id=12222&epslanguage=SV
   • Institute of European Food Studies. Pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health. Strain JJ (ed.) Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51 (Suppl 2): S1-49.
   • Becker W, Pearson M. Riksmaten 1997-98. Befolkningens kostvanor och näringsintag. Metod- och resultatanalys. Livsmedelsverket, Uppsala 2002.
   • Mæland JG, Aarø LE. Atferdsteori og forebyggende helsearbeid i praxis. Tidskr Nor Lægeforen 1993; 113. 51-5.
   • Roger Gidén Persson. Nyckelhålet. Hur uppfatter unga konsumenter symbolen? Gymnastikk og idrottshogskolan, Stockholm, 2005.
8. Norsjöprosjekt – en svensk modell för lokalt folkhälsoarbete, 1999 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/315/7108/582
9. www.choicesinternational.org
10. Food Safety Agency, UK: http://www.food.gov.uk/foodlabelling/signposting/siognpostlabelresearch/
    • First phase of information aimed at the consumer, Nov 2004 http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/alternlab.pdf
    • Quantitative Evaluation of Alternative Food Signpost concepts – Results of Consumer Research conducted on behalf of FSA, Nov 2005 http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/signpostquanresearch.pdf
11. Sainsbury’s, UK: http://www.sainsburys.co.uk/food/foodandfeatures/sainsburysandfood/labelling/default.htm
12. YouGov survey on behalf of Sainsbury’s among 2 465 adults during September 2006.
13. Which?, UK: Healthy signs research. Survey of 636 people representative of shoppers in Great Britain http://www.which.co.uk/files/application/pdf/HealthysignsfinalJuly06-445-88449.pdf
14. Tesco, UK: http://www.tesco.com/health/food/food_labelling/labelling.html
15. The Netherlands tripartite classification model for foods by the Netherlands Nutrition Centre. http://www.voedingscentrum.nl/voedingscentrum/Public/Statisch/English+summary/Projects+and+campaigns. htm
16. Meuldijk S, Van Assema P, Van Dis I, Mudde A. Helpfulness of nutritional value labels in choosing low fat products. Journal of Nutrition Education 1996; 53:776-780.
17. French Consumer Defence Association. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Study of nutrition labelling requirements in relation to nutrition policy. September 2006.
18. Pick the Tick New Zealand: http://www.pickthetick.org.nz/
19. Pick the Tick Australia: http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/index.htm
20. ANFZA. Food labelling issues – consumer qualitative research. Report to Australia New Zealand Food Authority. 2001.
21. Australia: 235 tonns of salt removed by reformulation 12 cereals to Tick standards. Williams et al Health Promotion International18:51-6, 2003.
22. New Zealand: 33 tonnes of salt removed via reformulation of 23 breakfast cereals, breads and margarines. Young et al, Health Promotion International, 17:13-19, 2002.
23. Det finsk hjertesymbolet: http://www.sydanmerkki.fi/
24. Recognition of the Finnish Heart symbol. TNS Gallup Ltd (Catibus and Gallup canal)
25. Health behaviour and health among Finnish Adult Population (AVTK)
26. Statens institutt for forbrukerforskning: Symbolmerking av sunn mat. Forbrukersurvey. Gunn Ross, 2007 http://www.sifo.no/page/Publikasjoner//10081/71704.html
27. European Heart Network: Misconceptions and Misinformation: The problems with Guideline Daily Amounts. February 2007. http://www.heartforum.org.uk/Publications_NHFreports_1816.aspx
28. European Heart Network: Review of “Front of Pack” Nutriton Schemes, February 2007. http://www.ehnheart.org/files/FOP%20Report%202007-104826A.pdf